Categories
HR Policy

Protected Speech In The Workplace and Profanity

By Lauren Amabile Sr. HRBP

The NLRB overruled a 2020 precedent related to the consequences faced by employees who use profane and/or harassing/discriminatory remarks during arguments at work in its May 1st decision in a case involving a manufacturing company based in Texas (Lions Elastomers, LLC.).

An employee of Lions Elastomers participated in a tense and “offensive” confrontation with company leadership over the workplace conditions—considered protected activity by the NLRB, resulting in his termination in 2017. The case was eventually handed to the Board following an appeals process and, at the time, the NLRB considered the dismissal to be unjust and ruled in favor of the employee’s reinstatement.

This ruling is particularly noteworthy for employers, as it returns the NLRB to a position of bolstered protections for workers participating in protected actions under the National Labor Relations Act. Though this recent decision is working its way through the appeals process, it is recommended that companies increase their consideration process when it comes to reprimanding employees for their conduct during disputes related to concerted activity.

The Board recognized in their decision that, while employers are understandably interested in an orderly and considerate work environment and employee relations, disputes related to working conditions can be caustic in nature and therefore, workers should be given grace related to their conduct in the heat of the moment, so as not to infringe on their rights under Section 7 of the NLRA.

According to the 2-person majority opinion, the employee’s behavior and conduct must be reviewed in the context of participating in concerted activity, and not as if it happened during regular business operations.

Categories
HR

Pay Transparency

The new pay transparency law in California requires employers with 15 or more employees to include salary on all job postings and employers with 100 or more employees must report pay data for existing employees. Pay data reports include the median and mean hourly rate for demographics, due on May 10, 2023 to the Civil Rights Department.

Whether your company falls under the pay transparency law or not it is important for you to understand where your company is falling short. Salary benchmarking may sound overwhelming but it can be helpful in attracting and retaining top talent. Some benefits include;

Attracting and Retaining talent
Increased motivation
Establish trust and loyalty among employees
Reduce pay inequality

We suggest taking the time to collect employee data including salaries, job responsibilities, and demographics (race, sex, sexual orientation, and education), then comparing it to your organization and similar companies to remain competitive.

Categories
HR Policy

Earned Wage Access

Research suggests that earned wage access is becoming more popular in how companies pay their employees. EWA is a revolutionary concept where employees can access their earned wages as early as the same day. Studies have shown that 60% of workers want on-demand pay, which increases a business’s ability to attract, retain and motivate employees. Simply having the option to request earned wages provides a higher sense of security for workers, even if they don’t utilize it. Earned wage access is an awesome way to stay ahead of the competition but there are some compliance items to think about. Here are 4 best practices when considering this benefit.

Ensure you have written policies that are compliant with state and federal laws including privacy and Paycard laws.

Get the consent of employees when sharing information to providers.
Consider benefits, implications and withholdings.
Research EWA providers and partner with experienced companies.
Have an attorney review for compliance risk

Categories
Human Resources

Large Wage & Hour Penalty for Popular Family-Owned Restaurant

In December, the U.S. Department of Labor received $370,194 for back waged and damages from the owners of Millie’s Café. The DOL found Millie’s Cafe denied workers overtime wages and hid the activity.

Millie’s Cafe owners violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to pay employees overtime. Investigators also found the restaurant attempted to conceal labor violations by issuing company checks and giving cash payments to employees. In addition, the DOL cited the restaurant for failing to keep records of employee hours, including overtime.

https://la.eater.com/2022/12/19/23516709/millies-cafe-pasadena-silver-lake-labor-department-labor-law-violation-overtime-pay-am-intel

Categories
HR

Pay Equality

With a focus on International Women’s Day last month, we thought we would discuss Pay Equality for the Newsletter.

Did you wonder why employers cannot ask candidates about their previous income in CA and select additional states? It is due to pay equality.

In the past, many businesses offered candidates pay based on their previous income. In an environment where women and most definitely, women of color, are paid less for the same work as their male counterparts, it is easy to imagine how quickly pay inequality can spiral under such practices.

In fact, California’s requirement came after a recent-ish case of a teacher, Aileen Rizo. She found out she was paid less than her male counterpart although she had more experience and education. When she inquired as to why she was paid less, the school listed prior income as the determining factor. She sued and won.

Equal pay for equal work. It is something you will see a lot of people on social media lamenting about right now. A ton of CEO’s will be declaring their companies stand behind women on International Women’s Day without actually putting in the work or looking at the data and adjusting. More of our small business clients practice wage equality than many of the large (boastful) companies we have come across. Our hats off to all of you for the equality practices we see every day!

For more on the Rizo case: https://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/politics/a22518299/aileen-rizo-equal-pay-case-california-state-assembly/

Categories
Cal/OSHA

OSHA300A Posting!

Notice to employers!

Starting February 1st OSHA and Cal/OSHA require employers with 20 or more (federal) 10 or more employees (CA) to post 2022 ‘s annual summary of work-related injuries and illnesses, including COVID-19 related cases. Form 300A must be posted in a visible and accessible area at all worksites between February 1st- April 30th.

Work-related injuries or illnesses include,

Death
Days away from work
Medical treatment beyond first aid
Loss of consciousness
Significant injury or illness
Days away from work

Links to OSHA300 forms

For all States: https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/OSHA-RK-Forms-Package.pdf

For CA: https://www.dir.ca.gov/dosh/dosh_publications/reckeepoverview.pdf

Categories
HR Policy

California’s New Bereavement Leave Requirement

On October 3, 2022, Assembly Bill Number 1949 passed requiring employers with five or more employees to grant unpaid bereavement leave up to five days upon the death of a family member. California is the third state to mandate this time off.

This applies to an employee who has been employed for at least 30 days prior to the leave who lost a “family member” is eligible for this leave. A “family member” is defined as a spouse, child, parent, sibling, grandparent, grandchild, domestic partner, or parent-in-law (parent of a spouse or domestic partner).

Categories
HR Policy

Designated Person addition to CFRA and California’s Paid Sick Leave

AB 1041 expands family members to designated persons, who would be identified at the time the employee requests the leave. An employer would be allowed to limit an employee to one designated person per 12-month period.

Existing state law, the Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act of 2014, generally entitles an employee who works in California for the same employer for 30 or more days within a year to paid sick days, including to care for an employee’s family member. AB 1041 expands the definition of the term “family member” to include a designated person.

The bill:

Adds a definition of the term “designated person” to mean “any individual related by blood or whose association with the employee is the equivalent of a family relationship.

The designated person may be identified by the employee at the time the employee requests the leave.

An employer may limit an employee to one designated person per 12-month period for family care and medical leave.

Categories
Human Resources

Emergencies, Cell Phone Use, and Reporting to Work

Currently, employers routinely have policies requiring reporting regardless of emergencies. They also prohibit using personal cell phones during working time. A new law requires an exception. The exception is an “emergency condition”.

In the event of an emergency condition, an employer shall not do either of the following:

Take or threaten adverse action against any employee for refusing to report to, or leaving, a workplace or worksite within the affected area because the employee has a reasonable belief that the workplace or work site is unsafe.

Prevent any employee from accessing the employee’s mobile device or other communications device for seeking emergency assistance, assessing the safety of the situation, or communicating with a person to verify their safety.

Exceptions

Reporting to unsafe working areas does not apply to

First responders/disaster workers

Employees required by law to render aid

Employee or contractor of a healthcare facility who provides patient care

Govt contractors for emergency services

Bank employees

Transportation employees participating in evacuations

An employee whose primary duties include assisting members of the public to evacuate in case of emergency

*The law does not apply when emergency conditions that pose “an imminent and ongoing risk of harm to the workplace, the worksite, or the worker’s home have ceased.” An “emergency condition” does not include pandemic.

Categories
HR Policy

CCPA

As of January 1st, 2023, the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) eliminates employers and the business-to-business (B2B) exemption from the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). This will apply to businesses that reside in California, have employees working in California, or have other connections to the state. Compliance with this act requires employers to provide notice before or during the time of collecting personal information including; categories of sensitive personal information, if this information is sold/shared, and the period the employer intends to hold this information. Employers must also provide notice on why this information is being collected. Employees have the right to know, delete, correct, and opt out of sales/sharing of their personal information. The expansion for Business-to-Business (B2B) protects the personal information collected from business contacts and is subject to CPRA privacy rights. Ensure that your company updates the privacy notice, policy, and procedures, and review and update employee data incorporating personal information collected in employment and B2B context.